|
|
|
|
Dear CIMG Members,
In
this edition we have included some interesting news, events, information
and articles. There has been much activity over the last couple
of months as well as notices from MLR to release new regulations.
Please be reminded that the last CIMG Monthly meeting for 2006 will
be held on Thursday December 14 at 4.00pm at the
Swissotel.
| News
from the last CIMG meeting held at the end of November
|
|
|
 |
|
|
Auslan opened the meeting and welcomed to those attending. He gave
an update of the November 13 pre-China Mining Congress function,
an update of the release of the Community Development Toolkit, update
on the release of the CIMG 2006 White Paper, notes on the release
of 2 laws by MLR regarding "Furthering Reform of the Exploration/Mining
License Issuance" as well as the "Equity Method for Paying
for Exploration/Mining License" and a final note regarding
a news item in the China Daily on revisions to regulations that
will affect exploration for gold. He also asked the floor for comments
on the China Mining Congress. A presenation was also given by Kumsan
on mining in North Korea. Lastly he announced upcoming events which
are outlined in more detail below.
Auslan noted
that the CIMG November 13 function, "State to State - Mining
in the Provinces" was a success. He also thanked SinoGold and
KPMG for their sponsorship of the day. The CIMG event followed on
from the "Australia-China Mining" event held by the Australian
Embassy in Beijing, This event focussed on inward investment in
the resource sector in Australia. The "State to State - Mining
in the Provinces" focussed on mining in the Provinces of China.
The entire day attracted 280attendees with close to 100 attendees
from Chinese Government and industry, On the "State to State
- Mining in the Provinces" panel were the following provinces;
Jiangxi, Shandong, Guangxi, Xinjiang, Shanxi, Guizhou and Hebei.
A contact list of the the officials on the panel can be requested
from the CIMG Secretariat. The officials from the provinces provided
various outlooks on mining in their provinces and their attendance
has opened the door for further discussions in 2007.
On the November
13 during the "State to State - Mining in the Provinces"
the CIMG in association released the Mandarin version of the "Community
Development Toolkit". The Community Development Toolkit was
first published in November 2005, jointly by ICMM, the World Bank
and ESMAP. The CIMG were responsible for the Mandarin translation.
It was developed to support government, industry, and community
efforts to realize more sustainable community development around
mining and mineral processing operations. The Mandarin version of
the Community Development Toolkit is the most comprehensive document
of its type available in China and is a worthy addition to any company,
NGO, government department looking at sustainable outcomes when
engaging the community. The Toolkit was well recieved by domestic
industry and the CIMG will be looking at some pilot project areas
in 2007 where the toolkit will form a foundation to the sustainability
platform of the CIMG. Copies of the Toolkit are free and are available
from the CIMG Secretariat.
Just prior to
China Mining the CIMG presented the "CIMG White Paper 2006"
to officials at the Ministry of Land and Resources. The paper is
bilingual and contains a number of issues facing international miners
in China. Over 150 copies were distributed to officials and industry
during the China Mining Congress. Copies of the White Paper can
be downloaded from here.
Auslan made
a short note on the that MLR Beijing issued 2 new regulations. The
CIMG was recently informed that MLR Beijing issued 2 new regulations:
1. Notice By MLR
Regarding Furthering Reform of the Exploration/Mining License Issuance
2. Equity Method
for Paying for Exploration/Mining License
The following
is the key contents of the document, which will be executed from
Jan 1, 2007. with major contents as follows:
1. In the aspect
of new issuance of license, except for those can be applied for
or agreed upon based on relevant government regulation, all licenses
shall be bid for on the market.
2. Except for otherwise
stated, all license fees shall be transferred as state capital or
equity.
3. All exploration
licenses which were previously issued freely and funded by the government
or local governments and with proven resources, and all mining licenses
that were given freely, shall be re-evaluated, and license holder
shall pay for the deposits left.
4. For the payment
of license, the holder can pay by 1) one lump sum at one time; 2)
down payment within 2 years; mining license in 10 years;
3) equity based on the payment amount;
5. Those funded
by the state government shall be owned by the national geological
fund management departments;
6. Those previously
received and changed status as national funds shall pay licenses;
7. Those license
held by the state-owned bureaus can continue to hold those licenses
and can still change the license fee to state capital.
8. For those metals
that can not be dealt with on the market, such as uranium, the exploration/mining
licenses are not being capitalized.
The regulations
both in Chinese and English can be downlowded from here.
Comments were
asked from the floor regarding news from the China Daily titled,
"New rules to make gold shinier industry",
that focussed on revisions to regulations that will affect exploration
for gold. The CIMG is seeking comment from members on this news
item. To read more a copy on the news article can be read clicking
here.
Comments were
also asked from the floor regarding the China Mining Congress. The
comments were mixed. Comments included "a lack of majors",
"drop in Chinese attendees", "Good traffic in exhibition
area", etc. The comments were short and if you do have further
comment on the congress please email them to the CIMG Secretariat.
Roger Barret
from Kumsan JV presented on mining in North Korea. For those of
you who would like a copy of the presentation or a interested in
mining in this region please contact Roger at roger@kbc-global.com.
Lastly the CIMG
has some interesting events lined up. One will be the tax update
with PriceWaterhouseCoopers and SAT which will be held in January
next year. As well, please mark your diaries for the CIMG Appreciation
Dinner that will be held on 31 January. More details of these events
will be emailed to you soon.
|
|
THE
SWANN GROUP HR SURVEY OF CHINA MINING INDUSTRY – NOVEMBER
06:
Earlier on in
2006 The Swann Group began a survey that was aimed to collect
salary information of the industry in China, particularly from the
point of view of the foreign mining company. Attached is the report
that was written from the data collected by The Swann Group in association
with the CIMG and the Mining Journal China. This is the second HR
survey of the foreign mining community in China.
The Swann Group
is very grateful for the time given by those who participated in
the survey. It was not an easy task from either side; giving the
data or receiving it. There were many different organisation structures
in place and salaries paid in a variety of currencies. However,
The Swann Group would like to note that it was great to be able
to work with the mining community in China to draw as much of this
together as they could.
Please note
that confidentiality was critical in an exercise that looks at what
people are paid. The Swann Group have been at pains to respect the
privacy of individuals and companies in reporting the data gathered.
It has not been possible to write a report that covers the broad
sweep of info gathered. It is considered most fair that those who
participated in the information gathering have the right to seek
specific information for their particular needs. They are welcome
to call Swann to get these more specific readings of the data. But
of course, still within the confidentiality boundaries.
Feel most welcome
to give The Swann Group or the CIMG Secretariat your feedback. As
well, let the Secretariat know if you have any thoughts on other
information that could be gathered by a later survey, which will
continue these on a quarterly basis.
Click
here to download the survey report
Media
Engagement
The CIMG is now contributing regularly to the
MINING JOURNAL CHINA and WORLD NON FERROUS METALS. The Secretariat
is seeking content related to Environment, Community, Safety and Technology.
Articles should be case studies, in Chinese and 2 pages long. This
is a unique chance to share information and promote the international
mining community in China. If you are interested in submitting an
article, please send your article as a word document to admin@austcham.org
by the first week of the month to be published the following month.
Back to top
|
| Improving
coverage of biodiversity in EIAs - Company: Noranda Inc. |
Background
The Convention on Biological Diversity provided strong support for
the development of impact assessment techniques especially related
to biodiversity. Although EIAs have traditionally addressed biodiversity
issues, they have been generic in nature. Often, they did not consider
non-protected species, different levels of biodiversity, structural
and functional relationships within biological systems and between
biophysical and socio-economic systems, potential indirect and cumulative
impacts and possible mitigation measures, possibilities for enhancement
or the concerns of communities and other biological resource users.
In addition, they commonly lacked proper baseline surveys or data,
the use of relevant scientific literature, clear criteria for assessing
impact magnitude and significance and plans for post-project monitoring.
Taking Biodiversity into Account
In order to take into account various aspects of biodiversity, an
environmental impact assessment should:
• consider all the relevant levels of biodiversity –
bioregional, landscape, ecosystem, habitat, communities, species,
populations and (when appropriate) individuals and genes; consider
connections between the levels of biodiversity by looking at structural
and functional relationships (such as connectivity, fragmentation
and disturbance, hydrologic and demographic processes) and their
relationship to biodiversity study areas likely to be affected by
different impact types;
• collect more detailed abundance and distribution data
on certain aspects of biodiversity without necessarily surveying
everything in detail, but focusing on key biodiversity receptors;
consider the full range of potential impacts, including indirect,
cumulative and induced impacts;
• consider the social dimension – the importance
of community and indigenous knowledge of local biodiversity aspects,
traditional uses of resources and habitat and stakeholder participation;
and set out clear criteria to judge the extent, magnitude and importance
of impact.
The Importance of Starting Early
Ideally, assessments should be done at the exploration stage. However,
the inherent redundancy of the process (only 0.1 per cent of targets
represent potentially economic mineral deposits) means that there
is resistance to spending survey money when the odds are that the
area will be released with no further interest. On the other hand,
early knowledge of critical biodiversity issues in a given project
would provide very pertinent insights and should have some weight
in the decision balance of the sustainability of the development
project. (In fact, some money could be saved by stopping the project
at an early instead of a later stage.) It is important to distinguish
between the different stages of exploration and when an EIA is most
likely to be triggered. General understanding of biodiversity issues
in an area before bidding on exploration licences can be important.
An important step in gaining an understanding of how the system
might be changed by a proposed project is to survey existing conditions
– the baseline environment. The baseline survey should provide
the necessary information on the site-specific environmental setting
of the project. It should cover the different seasons, migrations,
breeding and so on and should be, if feasible, long enough to establish
pre-project trends. One important challenge in assessing baseline
conditions is the limited time frame for a thorough assessment.
Biodiversity field surveys require sufficient time and resources.
And to be of significant value in the EIA, survey work needs to
be initiated early in the process. There should be scope to take
as long as necessary and appropriate to cover aspects such as migrations,
breeding seasons, rainy seasons and so on.
Important Roles for Companies
Companies should demonstrate a high-level commitment to the integration
of biodiversity aspects into decision-making processes and to the
maintenance and enhancement of important and protected habitats
and species. They should commit to addressing biodiversity at ecosystem,
species and genetic levels as appropriate and to integrating associated
social aspects.
The interrelationships between biological/ecological systems and
human systems should be identified and the impacts on these relationships
addressed in a local, regional, national and international context.
In adopting an ecosystem approach, ecosystem functions and structure
should be maintained.
The diversity of species or richness of ecosystems at the future
project site should be understood, alongside related cultural and
social aspects. Impact assessments should identify if a site is
important and why. Does it contain or lie within a protected area?
Is it a sensitive or vulnerable site with high biodiversity values?
Is it a site of cultural importance? There should also be recognition
of and respect for specific local biodiversity values and uses as
well as for local, traditional and indigenous knowledge of the area.
Impact assessment should be viewed as a process, not a product.
Direct, secondary and cumulative impacts on biodiversity should
be assessed in a phased approach, both early in the project and
throughout the life of the mine. Impact assessment should also take
into account social, economic and health impacts. The open and iterative
process should actively seek and allow time for stakeholder input.
Biodiversity data gathered in baseline studies, impact assessments
and subsequent monitoring should be shared with and validated by
stakeholders, including local communities, academics, conservation
organisations and other companies.
Impacts on biodiversity should be avoided wherever possible, minimised
where they cannot be avoided, and mitigated where there are residual
impacts. During the development phase of a project, there should
be a rigorous assessment of all options, including ‘do
nothing’. Offsets may be useful in mitigating residual impacts,
and preference should be given to in situ offsets that are aligned
with local, regional, national and international conservation strategies
and goals and that bring a net positive benefit for biodiversity
conservation.
Last, companies can manage risk around biodiversity and maximise
positive contributions by working in partnership with government,
communities and others. Community involvement in biodiversity assessment
should be implemented at an early stage, and sufficient time should
be allowed for government, industry and other stakeholders to understand,
evaluate and discuss biodiversity concerns throughout the process.
|
|
CONTRIBUTIONS: The CIMG welcomes contributions for publication in this
e-news from its members. Please contact and post submissions to Auslan
at admin@austcham.org
If you have any
questions on the CIMG please call Mary or Auslan at the CIMG Secretariat
on +86 10 65959252
|
|
|