|
|
|
|
Dear CIMG Members,
In
this edition we have included some interesting news, events, information
and articles.
Please be reminded that the next CIMG Monthly meeting will be held
on Thursday 26 April at 4.00pm at the Swissotel.
For more information please email Mary at mary@cimg.org.cn.
| News
from the last CIMG meeting held in March 2007 |
|
|
 |
|
|
The last CIMG saw good attendence and the attendees were very fortunate
to be able to meet represtatives from the National Mongolian Mining
Association as well as listen to a very informative presentation
from Doug Smith from ERM.
Auslan gave a brief update on the activities of the CIMG at the
start of the meeting. He made note of PDAC and some of the
comments made relating to China's investment abroad. Some of these
comments related to the growing need for Chinese companies to adopt
international practices in relation to thier operations in other
countries. Auslan further confirmed that the recent news on the
nation wide ban on EL's was applicable only to coal and not other
minerals. This was further demonstrated by the recent news on Jiangxi
encouraging foreign investment in gold mines.
He made note
of the CIMG Work Program 2007 – Q2, which includes:
1. Monthly meetings:
i. April 26, May31 and June 28
2. Upcoming Events
i. Golf Day – Beijing
June 1
ii.
Provincial Environmental Dialogue – Chengdu 23 May
iii.
Provincial Investment Dialogue – Chengdu 23 May
(Both of these events are to co-incide with the Western Mining China
Summit)
3. Publications
i.
To be released in conjunction with (b)
ii.
Grassroots Lobbying Paper – “ Benefits of Mining"
iii.
Sustainable Mining – “Case Studies of CIMG Members
in the field"
4. Mission
At
the end of June the CIMG will lead a mission Xinjiang and Inner
Mongolia.
5. Other
The CIMG in association with ERM is planning to offer industry training
on CSR and Community Engagement.
6. Research Committees
The CIMG in its effort to generate useful
dialogue will be devising a few reseach committees that will be
member lead.
These committees
will address topical issues relevent to the mining in China. Committees
will include both general and
specific items.
More news on will be emailed in the coming week.
For more information on these activites or if you would like to
get involved please contact the Auslan at the CIMG Secretariat at
+86 10 65959252 ext 208 or by email to auslan@cimg.org.cn.
Afterwards a presentation was given by Doug Smith from ERM. This
presentation focussed on working in environmentally sensitive
areas. Douglas has much experience especially with World Bank related
projects and will showcase some international case studies in his
presentation. For a copy of his presentation please email Doug at
douglas.smith@erm.com
Followig this a presentation was given br Mr Algaa the Executive
Director of the National Mongolian Mining Association. He provided
a concise outlook of the current climate for FDI in Mongolia. His
presentation can be downloaded by clicking here.
The second quarter
will be a busy one for the CIMG and its members and the SecreThere
will be a number of missions to the provinces in China and workshops.
Lastly he added that the CIMG speaking program had been completed
and asked members to read over to express their interest to present.
For a copy of the CIMG Strategy 2007 and the speaking program please
contact Auslan at auslan@cimg.org.cn.
|
CIMG 2007 Environmental Roundatable
23rd May to 23rd May 2007
Venue: Chengdu, Sichuan Province (meeting venue tba)
Time(s): 9:00am - 12:00pm
The CIMG is planning in conjunction with Sichuan academia and
Sichuan provincial officials, will organize an environment dialogue
for mining companies and those companies associated with the mining
industry in South West China.
If you are interested in taking part as a speaker or attendee please
contact the CIMG Secretariat at auslan@cimg.org.cn and a copy of the
mission statement will be emailed to you.
The dialogue seeks to enhance the understanding of sustainable mining
practices in the provincial areas of China. In this case the Southwestern
provinces. It also seeks to create a platform to increase information
sharing between foreign and domestic mining companies and those companies
associated with the mining industry on the opportunities of sustainable
mining. The South West of China is regarded as resource rich area
in China those attending the dialogue will explore not only
establish relationships with local partners but create solutions to
issues related to sustainable mining in the provinces.
This dialogue invites experts to join together with the mining executives,
academics and china policy makers, discuss and develop platforms to
engage in sustainable investment in the south western provinces of
China. This dialogue will have 40-50 both international and domestic.
This dialogue is being organized at the most opportune time when the
government is looking forward to expanding the developing the mining
sector in both ferrous and nonferrous metal industries of the country.
It will attract a high quality audience; provide a unique networking
platform and an exceptional educational opportunity for attendees.
The guiding mission is to promote challenging and timely investment
issues facing the mining community, and convene regional roundtable
sessions to debate and discuss contrasting perspectives surrounding
these issues.
This dialogue we will be exploring how our concepts of sustainable
mining are changing and how we can alter our views to embrace and
build upon the opportunities that greater understanding of risk can
bring. Specific focus will be placed on how those involved in the
mining process can systematically identify the risks they face, including
those hidden risks that are often overlooked and new risks that are
emerging, how to mitigate these to the benefit of the community as
a whole.
For more information on this event you can contact Auslan Ishmael
on +86 10 65959252 ext 208 or email auslan@cimg.org.cn.
Media Engagement
The CIMG is now contributing regularly to the
MINING JOURNAL CHINA and WORLD NON FERROUS METALS. The Secretariat
is seeking content related to Environment, Community, Safety and Technology.
Articles should be case studies, in Chinese and 2 pages long. This
is a unique chance to share information and promote the international
mining community in China. If you are interested in submitting an
article, please send your article as a word document to auslan@cimg.org.cn.
Back to top
|
|
|
 |
|
Ecological Reclamation that Maximises Biodiversity
Gains
Source ICMM
Background
The direct impacts of mining disturbance to land surfaces are usually
severe, with the likelihood of the destruction of biodiversity within
natural ecosystems through the removal of natural soils, plants and
animals. But mining is a temporary land use: the mineral deposit is
finite and eventually exhausted. The major goal of sustainable rehabilitation
is therefore the maintenance of land use options for future generations.
Mine closure and rehabilitation also need to take into consideration
the long-term effects of acid mine drainage (AMD) and the need to
rehabilitate in a manner that reduces the generation of AMD to acceptable
levels. In conditions where the long-term risks of AMD are significant,
the design of rehabilitated profiles may need to be modified to minimise
the entrance of water or air.
Social factors should be considered, too, in practical restoration
planning when a mine is not isolated from surrounding communities
or is in a relatively heavily populated area. In such cases the rehabilitation
objectives need to be defined in close consultation with
local communities, as these are the people who will have to use the
rehabilitated land in perpetuity after the company is gone.
In many parts of the world the social and legislative context of mining
now requires some form of land rehabilitation goals to have been established
for after a mine closes, and these are often determined prior to granting
planning and operating permits for a new mine. Rehabilitation considerations
are now incorporated into mine planning and have become a major factor
governing mining operations, waste disposal and site closure. Yet
there remains a considerable legacy of poor reclamation practices
that, at best, have not provided any successful ecosystem development
– and certainly no consideration of biodiversity losses and
gains.
Keeping Biodiversity in Mind
Ecological restoration is about a broad set of activities –
enhancing, repairing or reconstructing degraded ecosystems –
and about optimising biodiversity returns. In essence, the restoration
of mined land is based around ecosystem reconstruction. It is usually
a question of re-establishing the ability of the land to capture and
retain fundamental resources – energy, water, nutrients and
species.
Ecological restoration with biodiversity benefits in mind must involve
an orderly set of considerations that promote successful procedures
and practices. Often these practices, although based on similar general
considerations, will need to be innovative because of unique circumstances
in each area and ecosystem. Restoration objectives must be formulated
from a detailed knowledge of the basic structural and functional characteristics
of natural ecosystems. While the very concept of restoration may imply
reinstating the pre-mining ecosystem, the practical context of any
site demands that the following be considered: speed of attainment,
economics (or cost-benefit), achievability and long-term stability
with ongoing management at a reasonable cost.
The Terminology of Mined Land Rehabilitation
Reclamation: the general process whereby land surface is returned
to some form of beneficial use
Restoration: reclamation that is guided by ecological principles and
promotes the recovery of ecological integrity; reinstatement of the
original (pre-mining) ecosystem in all its structural and functional
aspects
Rehabilitation: progression towards the reinstatement of the original
ecosystem
Replacement: the creation of an alternative ecosystem to the original
Topsoil: A Strategic Resource
Restoration planning models recognise that for most mine reclamation
programmes over the last 30 years, an overriding consideration has
been whether topsoil has been retained or lost. This will, in all
probability, determine how quickly a pre-mining ecosystem can be restored
with its biodiversity regained, and whether such a restoration goal
is actually realistic and sustainable. Topsoil is a strategic resource
that should be conserved if at all possible. Thus its removal, storage
and replacement have been subject to a great deal of technical research
in recent times in an effort to protect the physical and chemical
properties and the biological processes of this valuable natural resource.
Restoration practices where topsoil has been retained focus more on
the spatial and temporal factors affecting species colonisation and
establishment; the criteria for monitoring and assessing success,
particularly in the longer term; and the restoration of natural indigenous
ecosystems and biodiversity values.
In the restoration of sites where topsoil has been lost, the major
ecological challenges are still related to the interactions between
plant species and substrate – that is, revegetation. Yet in
these cases faithful restoration of original ecosystems is rare. Mining
substrates vary considerably in their physical and chemical attributes,
but they tend to inhibit natural colonisation, and further succession
may be restricted because of metal toxicity, infertility or acidity.
Slow natural succession has sometimes been promoted as a reclamation
option, but this is usually politically unacceptable in an era when
closure planning is becoming an everyday expectation. The principal
restoration options in the absence of topsoil are the ameliorative
approach (improving the physical or chemical nature of the site),
and the adaptive approach (careful selection of species, cultivars
or ecotypes).
Judging Success
The development of measurable criteria for judging restoration success
has proved difficult, but standards are usually derived from the particular
community and ecosystem characteristics desired as restoration objectives.
Three general success guidelines have been proposed for a restored
ecosystem:
• self-regulation for some set period of
time, which entails having the structural and functional attributes
persist in the absence of whatever subsidies, such as fertilizer or
seeding, were needed during the initial implementation;
• achievement of the design criteria –
that is, the restoration goal and objectives – established
before restoration was undertaken; and
• the absence of any observable adverse
effects in the larger ecological landscape.
From these criteria, it can be seen that it is absolutely necessary
to have restoration objectives that have unambiguous and technically
feasible operational definitions, that are ecologically sound, scientifically
valid and socially relevant, and that are receptive to measurement
and prediction. The ecosystem characteristics measured are usually
those related to the composition, structure and pattern of the vegetation
as a key component of the biodiversity pool. It is notable that some
important structural measurements of biodiversity are usually left
out. In particular, the soil biotic community and animal species numbers
are not usually measured, even though they can often provide important
indications of long-term productivity and successional pathways.
|
|
CONTRIBUTIONS: The CIMG welcomes contributions for publication in this
e-news from its members. Please contact and post submissions to Auslan
at auslan@cimg.org.cn
|
|
|