|
The last CIMG saw good attendence and the attendees were given two
presentations. One was from the organisers of the Western Mining
Summit in Chengdu and the other from the CIMG on observations on
the recent CIMG mission to QInghai.
Nigel gave a brief update on the activities of the CIMG as well
as an update on the activities of the CIMG Advisory Panel at the
start of the meeting. He mentioned that the Advisors had
been been working with increasing the CIMG's involvement with the
China Mining Congress in an advisory capacity. This was so to assist
the congress in supporting the needs of the industry. The CIMG woud
also be collaborating with the CMA on this.
The Advisors
had also been in discussion with the CMA (China MiningAssociation)
in regards to the development of the CIMG. He noted that some members
had asked that the CIMG increase its international focus and to
increase its engagement with domestic industry. In doing so, the
Advisors are considering an option for the CIMG to align with the
CMA and move from its current alignment with the Australian Chamber
of Commerce.
He noted that
Auslan had been in touch with CIMG member companies in relation
to increasing level of governance in the CIMG. This would entail
a third party provider to manage the book keeping and financial
reporting. The next interim financial update for members will be
at the July meeting.
Nigel then closed
with some notes on some projects that the CIMG was currently undertaking.
These included the CIMG's environmental dialogue in Chengdu (more
details below) and a CIMG mission to Xinjiang in June (more details
below). If you would like to get involved please contact the Auslan
at the CIMG Secretariat at +86 10 65959252 ext 208 or by email
to auslan@cimg.org.cn.
Afterwards a presentation was given by Nick Tan from GIS. This presentation
focussed on the progress of the Western Mining Summit in Chengdu.
Nick outlined the main speakers, sponsors and the program. He also
noted that the CIMG had been very helpful in the design of the program
and that CIMG members who attend will be eligible for a 40% discount.
Nigel added that the CIMG had organised an industry to government
panel session on the second day of the summit to allow members to
question the government on upcoming trends for FDI in the provinces.
More information on the summit can be found by calling the CIMG
Secretariat.
Following this a presentation was given by Auslan on the observations
made during a recent CIMG mission to Qinghai. He noted that The
CIMG in conjunction with CCPIT Qinghai Province, organized a trade
mission for CIMG member mining companies to Qinghai Province. The
CIMG mission visited Xining as well as Eldorado's Tanjianshan mine.
The CIMG mission met with officials related to mining and FDI in
Qinghai including representatives from the BGMR, Qinghai CCPIT,
MOFCOM, Vice-Governor Li as well as senior mining executives from
domestic companies such as Western Mining and Chalco.
There were a
number of mixed messages regarding the acceptance of FDI in the
mining and minerals sector in Qinghai Province. On the one hand
overall messages were positive from MOFCOM and the Governor with
respect to FDI but mechanisms to be employed as expressed by the
BGMR officials were not perceived as positive. Moreover the mainstream
domestic mining companies represented do not appear to welcome international
investment at the current time. He also noted that the mission sought
to enhance the understanding of mining in the provincial areas of
China. It also sought to create a platform to increase investment
and trade opportunities between foreign and domestic mining companies
and those companies associated with the mining industry. Qinghai
is regarded as resource rich province in China and the mission delegates
explored business opportunities, established relationships with
local partners and gained a better understanding of accessing opportunities
in Qinghai Province.
The main points
he covered were:
-Qinghai has been closed for new exploration licenses for 2 years
-Qinghai;s mineral sector appears to be moving towards a quasi monopoly
with Western Mining being the key domestic player
-Local BGMR officials are hesitant to publicly list available tenements,
but instead refer to a "you ask and we tell" process.
-There is an apparent lack of communication between local government
departments regarding the promotion of FDI in mining. e.g. CCPIT
and BGMR where the CCPIT is for FDI and BGMR not.
-Very strong tendency by local entrepreneurs to treat mining tenements
as "real estate" rather for speculation than development.
-There is an apparent sentiment that local resources are to be reserved
for domestic companies.
-Qinghai is resource rich with much of the territory still to be
surveyed - only 15% has been mapped at 50,000 scale.
-There is very little to no interest for participation in greenfields
exploration.
In closing he
noted that there is FDI in mining in Qinghai as demonstrated by
Eldorado'sinvestment that clearly shows the possibilities for foreign
mining companies in this province. The attendees of the mission
noted that such success is determined by the mode of entry to this
province and the requirement of a very strong local partner.
A report of
the mission will be emailed shortly to all members.
|
|
Congratulations to SinoGold
The CIMG would like congratulate one of its long time members, SinoGold
for the succesful opening of their operation in Jinfeng on April
16. The official opening ceremony at Jinfeng was attended my many
local officials, Beijing officials as well as the Australian Ambassador
to China. There were also a number of the local popluation in attendance.
Mr Gao, the Standing Vice President from the CNIA said that this
operation is a leading example for the future of the development
of China's mining sector. He noted that the operation had demonstrated
commitment to management, technology and and local community.
CIMG 2007 Environmental Roundatable
23rd May to 23rd May 2007
Venue: Chengdu, Sichuan Province - Currently the Chengdu University
of Technology
Time(s): 9:00am - 12:00pm
The CIMG is planning in conjunction with Sichuan academia
and Sichuan provincial officials, will organize an environment dialogue
for mining companies and those companies associated with the mining
industry in South West China.
We are hoping that members in Sichuan at this time will be eager
to attend and we look forward to your RSVPs.
The dialogue seeks to enhance the understanding of sustainable mining
practices in the provincial areas of China. In this case the Southwestern
provinces. It also seeks to create a platform to increase information
sharing between foreign and domestic mining companies and those
companies associated with the mining industry on the opportunities
of sustainable mining. The South West of China is regarded as resource
rich area in China those attending the dialogue will explore not
only establish relationships with local partners but create
solutions to issues related to sustainable mining in the provinces.
This dialogue invites experts to join together with the mining executives,
academics and china policy makers, discuss and develop platforms
to engage in sustainable investment in the south western provinces
of China. This dialogue will have 40-50 both international and domestic.
This dialogue is being organized at the most opportune time when
the government is looking forward to expanding the developing the
mining sector in both ferrous and nonferrous metal industries of
the country. It will attract a high quality audience; provide a
unique networking platform and an exceptional educational opportunity
for attendees. The guiding mission is to promote challenging and
timely investment issues facing the mining community, and convene
regional roundtable sessions to debate and discuss contrasting perspectives
surrounding these issues.
This dialogue we will be exploring how our concepts of sustainable
mining are changing and how we can alter our views to embrace and
build upon the opportunities that greater understanding of risk
can bring. Specific focus will be placed on how those involved in
the mining process can systematically identify the risks they face,
including those hidden risks that are often overlooked and new risks
that are emerging, how to mitigate these to the benefit of the community
as a whole.
For more information on this event you can contact Auslan Ishmael
on +86 10 65959252 ext 208 or email auslan@cimg.org.cn.
CIMG Mission to Xinjiang
20 June to 24 June 2007
The CIMG in conjunction with CCPIT and BGMR Xinjiang Province, will
organize a trade mission for mining companies and those companies
associated with the mining industry in China to Xinjiang Province.
The mission seeks to enhance the understanding of mining in the
provincial areas of far western China. It also seeks to create a
platform to increase investment and trade opportunities between
foreign and domestic mining companies and those companies associated
with the mining industry. Xinjiang Province is currently positive
in its sentiment to FDI in its mining sector is regarded as resource
rich province in China. The mission will explore business opportunities
and establish relationships with local partners.
For more information
and the pricing ofthis mission you can contact Auslan Ishmael on
+86 10 65959252 ext 208 or email auslan@cimg.org.cn.
Media Engagement
The CIMG is now contributing regularly to the
MINING JOURNAL CHINA and WORLD NON FERROUS METALS. The Secretariat
is seeking content related to Environment, Community, Safety and
Technology. Articles should be case studies, in Chinese and 2 pages
long. This is a unique chance to share information and promote the
international mining community in China. If you are interested in
submitting an article, please send your article as a word document
to auslan@cimg.org.cn.
Back to top
|
Improving
coverage of biodiversity in EIAs - Company: Noranda Inc.
Source ICMM
Background
The Convention on Biological Diversity provided strong support for
the development of impact assessment techniques especially related
to biodiversity. Although EIAs have traditionally addressed biodiversity
issues, they have been generic in nature. Often, they did not consider
non-protected species, different levels of biodiversity, structural
and functional relationships within biological systems and between
biophysical and socio-economic systems, potential indirect and cumulative
impacts and possible mitigation measures, possibilities for enhancement
or the concerns of communities and other biological resource users.
In addition, they commonly lacked proper baseline surveys or data,
the use of relevant scientific literature, clear criteria for assessing
impact magnitude and significance and plans for post-project monitoring.
Taking Biodiversity
into Account
In order to take into account various aspects of biodiversity, an
environmental impact assessment should:
-consider all the relevant levels of biodiversity – bioregional,
landscape, ecosystem, habitat, communities, species, populations
and (when appropriate) individuals and genes; consider connections
between the levels of biodiversity by looking at structural and
functional relationships (such as connectivity, fragmentation and
disturbance, hydrologic and demographic processes) and their relationship
to biodiversity study areas likely to be affected by different impact
types;
-collect more detailed abundance and distribution data on certain
aspects of biodiversity without necessarily surveying everything
in detail, but focusing on key biodiversity receptors; consider
the full range of potential impacts, including indirect, cumulative
and induced impacts;
-consider the social dimension – the importance of community
and indigenous knowledge of local biodiversity aspects, traditional
uses of resources and habitat and stakeholder participation; and
set out clear criteria to judge the extent, magnitude and importance
of impact.
The Importance of Starting Early
Ideally, assessments should be done at the exploration stage. However,
the inherent redundancy of the process (only 0.1 per cent of targets
represent potentially economic mineral deposits) means that there
is resistance to spending survey money when the odds are that the
area will be released with no further interest. On the other hand,
early knowledge of critical biodiversity issues in a given project
would provide very pertinent insights and should have some weight
in the decision balance of the sustainability of the development
project. (In fact, some money could be saved by stopping the project
at an early instead of a later stage.) It is important to distinguish
between the different stages of exploration and when an EIA is most
likely to be triggered. General understanding of biodiversity issues
in an area before bidding on exploration licences can be important.
An important step in gaining an understanding of how the system
might be changed by a proposed project is to survey existing conditions
– the baseline environment. The baseline survey should provide
the necessary information on the site-specific environmental setting
of the project. It should cover the different seasons, migrations,
breeding and so on and should be, if feasible, long enough to establish
pre-project trends. One important challenge in assessing baseline
conditions is the limited time frame for a thorough assessment.
Biodiversity field surveys require sufficient time and resources.
And to be of significant value in the EIA, survey work needs to
be initiated early in the process. There should be scope to take
as long as necessary and appropriate to cover aspects such as migrations,
breeding seasons, rainy seasons and so on.
Six Important
Roles for Companies
Companies should demonstrate a high-level commitment to the integration
of biodiversity aspects into decision-making processes and to the
maintenance and enhancement of important and protected habitats
and species. They should commit to addressing biodiversity at ecosystem,
species and genetic levels as appropriate and to integrating associated
social aspects.
The interrelationships
between biological/ecological systems and human systems should be
identified and the impacts on these relationships addressed in a
local, regional, national and international context. In adopting
an ecosystem approach, ecosystem functions and structure should
be maintained.
The diversity of species or richness of ecosystems at the future
project site should be understood, alongside related cultural and
social aspects. Impact assessments should identify if a site is
important and why. Does it contain or lie within a protected area?
Is it a sensitive or vulnerable site with high biodiversity values?
Is it a site of cultural importance? There should also be recognition
of and respect for specific local biodiversity values and uses as
well as for local, traditional and indigenous knowledge of the area.
Impact assessment
should be viewed as a process, not a product. Direct, secondary
and cumulative impacts on biodiversity should be assessed in a phased
approach, both early in the project and throughout the life of the
mine. Impact assessment should also take into account social, economic
and health impacts. The open and iterative process should actively
seek and allow time for stakeholder input. Biodiversity data gathered
in baseline studies, impact assessments and subsequent monitoring
should be shared with and validated by stakeholders, including local
communities, academics, conservation organisations and other companies.
Impacts on biodiversity
should be avoided wherever possible, minimised where they cannot
be avoided, and mitigated where there are residual impacts. During
the development phase of a project, there should be a rigorous assessment
of all options. Offsets may be useful in mitigating residual impacts,
and preference should be given to in situ offsets that are aligned
with local, regional, national and international conservation strategies
and goals and that bring a net positive benefit for biodiversity
conservation.
Last, companies
can manage risk around biodiversity and maximise positive contributions
by working in partnership with government, communities and others.
Community involvement in biodiversity assessment should be implemented
at an early stage, and sufficient time should be allowed for government,
industry and other stakeholders to understand, evaluate and discuss
biodiversity concerns throughout the process.
|